Data Project:
Last Modified: October 13, 2020
URLhttps://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/823123
Created September 2, 2020
Modified October 13, 2020
State Preliminary and in progress

Acquisition Description

Location:
Samples were collected from Subglacial Lake Whillans, at the lower portion of the Whillans Ice Stream, West Antarctica. Samples were collected through a 800m borehole created with a clean, hot water drill system. Coordinates: 85°1’12”S and 83°47’24”S Latitude; 155°19’48”W and 131°46’12”W Longitude

Methodology:
Planktonic microbial cells were collected on 0.2, 0.8, 3.0, and 10.0 micron filters and community structure was determined from 16S rRNA gene identities. Microbial community structure was also determined for samples from a shallow sediment core (0-40 cm).

For full methodology details refer to Christner et al., 2014. Further detailed methods for microbial community composition can be found in Achberger et al., 2017.
 

Design description:
 

A hot water drilling system was used between 23–27 January 2013 to melt through the ~801 m thick ice sheet, creating an access borehole (minimum diameter ~60 cm) for direct sampling and to conduct in situ measurements of the SLW water column and sediments. Microbial cells in the drilling water and on exposed surfaces of the hose, cables, and deployed equipment were reduced and killed through the use of four complementary technologies: (1) filtration, (2) ultraviolet irradiation, (3) pasteurization, and (4) disinfection with 3% w/v H2O2. The drilling water, derived from the overlying ice sheet, was continuously circulated through a water treatment system that removed micron and sub-micron sized particles (>0.2 μm), irradiated the drilling water with two germicidal wavelengths of ultraviolet radiation (185 nm ~40,000 µW s−1 cm−2 and 254 nm ~175,000 µW s−1 cm−2), and pasteurized the water at 90 °C to reduce the viability of persisting microbial contamination. Ports were plumbed along the system’s flow path, allowing discrete water samples to be obtained before and after each stage. The drill hose and instrument cables were deployed at a rate no greater than 1 m s−1 through a custom borehole collar that contained 12 amalgam pellet ultraviolet lamps, providing a cumulative germicidal ultraviolet dosage of at least 40,000 µW s−1 cm−2 (Arapahoe SciTech). All borehole sampling tools and instruments were spray-saturated with 3% w/v H2O2 and staged in sealed polyethylene bags until tool deployment. Single-use protective apparel (Tyvek) was worn by all personnel during borehole science operations. The efficacy of the clean access technology and procedures were tested thoroughly before use in the field.
 

Sampling description
 

Water samples were collected and brought to the surface in Niskin bottles. Particulate matter for DNA sequence analyses was collected on 10.0, 3.0, 0.8, and 0.2 micron filters by an in situ filtration unit. Sediment samples were collected and brought to the surface using a shallow sediment multicorer. 
 

Analytical Methods:
 

Sample Processing
 

SLW sediment porewater samples were collected from multicore 3B (MC-3B) using a Rhizon porewater sampler (Rhizosphere). Rhizon porewater samplers were prepared by soaking in MilliQ (18.2 MΩ) water prior to installation through a pre-drilled hole in the sediment core liner. A 10 mL syringe was attached to the outlet and the plunger locked to maintain a vacuum. After 14 h of porewater extraction through the 0.2 µm filter on the end of the Rhizon, the porewater was dispensed into cleaned bottles/vials (Major ions: 10% HCl acid washed and 6 MilliQ rinses; Trace elements: 10% trace metal grade HNO3 acid washed and 6 MilliQ rinses; Water stable isotopes: new, filled with no headspace). SLW water samples for major ion analysis were filtered through a 0.4 µm polycarbonate filter (Whatman) and TE/REE samples were filtered through a 0.2 µm PTFE membrane syringe filter. The filtrate, or raw water in the case of the water stable isotope samples, was dispensed into a bottle cleaned as described above. Major ion and TE samples were frozen at -20°C and shipped to Montana State University and University of Venice, respectively, for analysis. Stable isotope samples were stored at 4°C and were shipped to University of Washington-Seattle for analysis. Procedural blanks were handled and processed in parallel to SLW samples. Briefly, MilliQ water from McMurdo Station was taken into the field in a 10% HCl acid washed and 6-time MilliQ rinsed HDPE bottle and was run through the same sampling set up for SLW water samples. For the porewater procedural blanks, rhizons were inserted into the MilliQ bottle and ~5 mL of water was pulled through the Rhizon into the syringe and allowed to reside in the syringe for 14 h to replicate syringe residence time. Procedural blank water was then dispensed into the three sample containers for subsequent analysis as described above.    
 

Functional Gene Analyses 
 

DNA was extracted using a modular method to allow for optimization of the DNA extraction procedure, specific to the SLW sediments. DNA extraction yield from SLW sediments was greatest when sediments were pre-treated with 450 µmol g-1 deoxynucleotide triphosphate to prevent adsorption of lysed DNA to the abundant clay particles in SLW44. The particulate methane monooxygenase (pmoA) gene clone libraries were constructed by PCR amplification using A189F (5’ GGNGACTGGGACTTCTGG 3’) and m680R (5’ CCGGMGCAACGTCYTTACC 3’). The PCR was set up using 0.13 µL of ExTaq at 5 units µL-1 (Takara), 2.5 µL of 10x ExTaq buffer (Takara), 2 µL dNTP mixture at 2.5mM per nucleotide (Takara), 2.5 µL of A189F and Mb661R primers (10 pmol µL-1), 2 µL molecular biology-grade bovine serum albumen (BSA; 1.6 mg ml-1 final concentration) (New England BioLabs Inc.), 4 µL of template DNA (0.01-0.09 ng DNA µL-1), and 11.37 µL of PCR-grade water for a final reaction volume of 25 µL. The PCR thermocycling conditions were 1 cycle of 98°C for 2 min; 40 cycles of 98°C for 15 s, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min; followed by a final 72°C for 7 min. PCR was conducted with DNA extraction blanks and no template blanks (PCR-grade water) as negative controls. Negative controls were not carried forward for cloning, as no PCR bands were detected. PCR products were run on a 1.5% agarose gel and the 491 basepair pmoA fragment was excised from the gel with sterile razor blade and DNA was purified using a Wizard SV gel clean-up system (Promega). Cleaned pmoA fragments were immediately ligated and cloned with a TA Cloning kit (Invitrogen). Positive clones were transferred to LB+ampicillin broth and grown overnight at 37°C, then sequenced (288 total sequenced clones) (Functional Bioscience). The pmoA DNA sequences were processed by removing the forward and reverse primer sequences and removing poor quality sequences (<20 phred score). Quality controlled pmoA sequences (176 total) were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at the 97% similarity level and one representative sequence from each OTU51, along with representative pmoA sequences from type Ia and II methanotrophs, were aligned using ClustalW using the default alignment parameters within the program MEGA6. A phylogenetic tree was built using the neighbor-joining method with 1000 bootstrap replications52. The pmoA sequences have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers KX589304-KX589461 and KX784213-KX84230.

We attempted to amplify mcrA gene sequences from SLW sediment DNA extracts using a primer set designed to amplify the diversity of mcrA-containing methanogens with a nested PCR amplification scheme. The primer pair used to detect the mcrA gene sequence were mcrIRD. The primer pair is capable of detecting a wide diversity of known and several novel mcrA gene clusters. The first reaction was set up using 0.13 µL of Takara ExTaq at 5 units µL-1, 2.5 µL 10x ExTaq buffer, 2 µL dNTP mixture at 2.5mM per nucleotide (Takara), 2.5 µL of forward and reverse primer (10 pmol µL-1), 2 µL of BSA (1.6 mg ml-1 final concentration), 9.38 µL PCR-grade water and 4 µL DNA extract (0.01-0.09 ng DNA µL-1) for a final reaction volume of 25 µL. This first reaction was run with an initial denaturation step at 98°C for 2 minutes followed by 40 cycles of 98°C for 15 s, 53°C for 1 min and 72°C for 1 min, and a final elongation at 72°C for 7 min. The second reaction was set up using 0.25 µL Takara ExTaq, 5 µL 10x ExTaq buffer, 4 µL dNTP mixture at 2.5mM per nucleotide (Takara), 5 µL of forward and reverse primers (10 pmol µL-1), 4 µL of BSA (1.6 mg ml-1 final concentration), 21.75 µL of PCR-grade water and 4 µL of product from the first reaction as template DNA. The second reaction was run with the same thermocycler program as the first reaction. PCR was conducted with DNA extraction blanks and no template blanks (PCR-grade water) as negative controls. Extraction blanks were conducted, processed and analyzed in parallel with the SLW sediment samples.

Processing Description

Paired end sequence reads were assembled and quality filtered using the Mothur phylogenetic analysis pipeline (v1.33.2). The sequences were aligned with the SILVA Incremental Aligner47 (SINA v1.2.11; database release 115). The aligned reads were checked for chimaeras using the Uchime algorithm, as implemented within Mothur, and chimaeric sequences were removed from the data. Sequences with >97% SSU rRNA gene sequence similarity were clustered into an OTU and representative sequences for each OTU were chosen for classification using the SILVA database.

Dataset Maintainers

NameAffiliationContact
Alexander B. MichaudMontana State University
Alexander B. MichaudMontana State University
Montana State University
Amber YorkWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI BCO-DMO)
Menu